Lens Mounts and Adapters: Flange Distance, Coverage and What You Lose
Short answer
A lens can be adapted to a camera when the camera mount has a shorter flange focal distance than the lens mount, because the adapter has to add distance rather than remove it. Mirrorless mounts have short flange distances, which is why EF, PL and F lenses adapt onto them freely and why adapting the other way is generally impossible.
Adapting lenses is one of the genuine advantages of mirrorless cameras, and the rules that govern it are simpler than they look. Flange focal distance decides what adapts to what, coverage decides whether the image fills the sensor, and electronics decide whether autofocus and aperture still work. The Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art is the standard example: an EF lens that lands on almost any modern body.
Flange focal distance, the rule that governs everything
Flange focal distance is the gap between the lens mounting flange and the sensor. Every mount has a fixed value, and a lens is designed to focus correctly at exactly that distance. An adapter is a spacer, so it can only add distance, never remove it.
That single fact produces the whole rule: a lens can be adapted onto a camera when the camera mount has a shorter flange distance than the lens mount, with the adapter making up the difference. Adapting the other way requires optical elements to shift the focal plane, and those elements degrade the image.
This is why mirrorless mounts adapt so freely. Removing the mirror box let manufacturers put the sensor much closer to the mount, so almost every SLR and cinema lens ever made has room to be adapted onto them.
The numbers
| Mount | Flange distance | Type | Adapts from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sony E | 18.0 mm | Mirrorless | EF, F, PL, M42, C, most SLR mounts |
| Canon RF | 20.0 mm | Mirrorless | EF, F, PL and most SLR mounts |
| Nikon Z | 16.0 mm | Mirrorless | The widest adaptability of the three |
| L mount | 20.0 mm | Mirrorless | EF, F, PL and most SLR mounts |
| Micro Four Thirds | 19.25 mm | Mirrorless | Almost everything, with a 2x crop |
| Canon EF | 44.0 mm | SLR | Very little. It is the donor mount |
| Nikon F | 46.5 mm | SLR | Almost nothing |
| ARRI PL | 52.0 mm | Cine | Nothing. It is the longest common mount |
Read that as a hierarchy. PL and F are the longest, so their lenses adapt onto everything shorter. E and Z are the shortest, so their lenses adapt onto nothing. This is why buying native mirrorless glass locks you to that system and buying EF or PL glass does not, which is a genuine argument for EF on a camera you might replace.
Coverage, which is the other constraint
Flange distance decides whether a lens can physically focus. Coverage decides whether its image circle is large enough to fill the sensor. These are separate and both must be satisfied.
A full frame lens covers a Super 35 or Micro Four Thirds sensor with room to spare, which is why adapting full frame glass to a smaller sensor always works optically and simply crops the field of view. A Super 35 lens on a full frame sensor vignettes, unless the camera has a crop mode, which most full frame cinema bodies do.
This matters when buying a matched cine set. The Sirui Night Walker S35 T1.2 Cine Set (24, 35, 55mm) set covers Super 35, so it works natively on a Sony FX30 or a Blackmagic Pocket body and requires a crop mode on a Sony FX3. That is a real decision with a real cost, not a footnote.
What you lose with an adapter
- Autofocus speed and reliability, on all but the best electronic adapters and often even then.
- Some in-body stabilisation behaviour, because the camera may not know the focal length unless the adapter reports it.
- Rigidity, since an adapter is an extra mechanical joint carrying a cantilevered lens.
- A small amount of light and contrast on adapters with poor internal blackening, which reflect stray light.
- Occasionally infinity focus, on cheap adapters machined slightly too long.
- Nothing at all optically, on a well-made dumb adapter for a manual lens, which is the case where adapting is genuinely free.
That last point is the useful one. Adapting a manual cine or vintage lens with a well-made mechanical adapter costs you essentially nothing, because there was no autofocus to lose and no electronics to translate. Adapting a modern autofocus lens is where the compromises live.
Adaptable glass and what supports it
$49 to $515. Two EF-mount lenses that adapt onto everything, and the rod-mounted support that keeps a heavy adapted lens from stressing the mount.
Sigma
Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art
The f/1.8 zoom that made Super 35 filmmaking cheap, and it still holds up on a Blackmagic body with a speed booster or an EF mount.
- Aperture
- f/1.8 constant
- Coverage
- APS-C
Heavy, and it needs lens support on rods.
Check price
Rokinon
Rokinon 35mm T1.5 Cine DS
A geared manual prime for the price of a filter, and the reason a first cine build can afford a follow focus at all.
- Aperture
- T1.5
- Focus
- Manual, geared
Sample variation is real. Check yours.
Check price
Tilta
Tilta 15mm Lens Support
Takes the weight of a heavy lens off the camera mount, which is a real mechanical failure point on a rig that also carries a matte box.
- Rods
- 15 mm
Mandatory with heavy zooms.
Check priceSpeed boosters and focal reducers
A speed booster is an adapter with optics that compress a larger image circle onto a smaller sensor. It reduces the effective focal length, typically by about 0.71x, and increases the effective aperture by about one stop, because the same light is concentrated onto a smaller area.
The practical effect is that a full frame lens on a Super 35 sensor behaves close to how it would on full frame, in both field of view and depth of field, and gains a stop of light. On paper this is close to free performance, and it is the reason many Blackmagic Pocket owners run EF glass through one.
The cost is optical. You are adding several elements to the path, and even a good speed booster costs some sharpness at the edges and some contrast. Cheap ones cost considerably more than that. It is a genuine tool rather than a trick, and it should be bought at the quality end or not at all.
Practical advice on buying into a mount
If you expect to change camera systems, buy EF glass and adapt it. EF lenses fit onto every mirrorless mount with a simple adapter, hold their value well, and there is an enormous used market. This is why EF stayed relevant long after Canon stopped building bodies for it.
If you have settled on a system, buy native. Native lenses are lighter, better balanced, autofocus properly and skip a mechanical joint. The convenience of adapting is a solution to uncertainty, and once uncertainty is gone it becomes a cost.
If you are buying manual cine glass, mount matters least of all. A manual lens is a barrel with glass in it, many are sold in several mount versions, and some use interchangeable mounts. Buy the set that suits your sensor coverage and worry about mount second.
Next, from here
- Best lenses for video
What to buy once the mount is decided.
- Best cine lenses
Where coverage and mount matter most.
- Crop factor and field of view
What a focal length becomes on your sensor.
- Sensor size and crop factor chart
Every format in one table.
- Depth of field calculator
What changes besides the framing.
- Best cinema cameras
Which mount each body actually uses.
Common questions
- Which lenses can I adapt to my camera?
- Any lens whose mount has a longer flange focal distance than your camera mount, because an adapter can only add distance rather than remove it. Mirrorless mounts sit between 16 and 20 mm, so EF at 44 mm, F at 46.5 mm and PL at 52 mm all adapt onto them freely. Adapting a native mirrorless lens onto an SLR body is generally impossible without optics.
- What is flange focal distance?
- The gap between the lens mounting flange and the sensor, which is fixed for each mount and is what a lens is designed to focus at. An adapter is a spacer that makes up the difference between a longer lens mount and a shorter camera mount. Because it can only add distance, the direction of adaptation is determined entirely by which mount is shorter.
- Do I lose image quality using an adapter?
- With a well-made mechanical adapter on a manual lens, essentially nothing, because there are no optics in the path. What you can lose is autofocus performance, some stabilisation behaviour when the camera does not know the focal length, rigidity from the extra mechanical joint, and a little contrast on adapters with poor internal blackening. Speed boosters add optics and do affect image quality.
- Will a Super 35 lens work on a full frame camera?
- Only in a crop mode, which most full frame cinema bodies offer. Used at full sensor width it will vignette, because its image circle is not large enough. This matters when buying a matched cine set: a Super 35 set is native on a crop body and requires a crop mode on a full frame one, which is a real decision rather than a footnote.
- What does a speed booster do?
- It compresses a larger image circle onto a smaller sensor, reducing effective focal length by about 0.71x and increasing effective aperture by roughly a stop, because the same light lands on a smaller area. A full frame lens on Super 35 through one behaves close to how it would on full frame. The cost is added optical elements, so buy a good one or none at all.
- Should I buy native lenses or adapt EF glass?
- Adapt EF if you might change camera systems, because EF fits every mirrorless mount, holds its value and has an enormous used market. Buy native once you have settled, because native lenses are lighter, better balanced, autofocus properly and remove a mechanical joint. Adapting is a solution to uncertainty, and it becomes a cost once the uncertainty is gone.
Totalling your own rig weight against your gimbal payload? The Camera Rig Build Planner is the paid version of these pages: 8 printable worksheets you fill in with your own numbers, plus the full PDF, $29.