Calculators
Ten calculators, each showing its working
Rig weight, gimbal payload, battery runtime, ND stops, crop factor, depth of field, hyperfocal distance, recording bitrate, storage per hour and timecode. Everything runs in your browser, nothing is sent anywhere, and every page shows the formula it uses.
10 pages in this section
Rigging and power
The numbers that decide which stabiliser, which head and which battery your build actually needs.
-
Rig weight calculator
Add up the body, lens, cage, monitor, microphone, battery and card to get the number every other decision depends on.
-
Gimbal payload calculator
Your real rig weight against a specific model rating, with the 70 to 80 percent working load rule applied.
-
Battery runtime calculator
Your actual device list against a real capacity, including conversion losses and continuous draws.
Exposure and framing
Filtration, shutter, focal length and focus, calculated for your own sensor and glass.
-
ND filter and shutter angle calculator
How many stops of ND your conditions need to hold a 180 degree shutter at the aperture you want.
-
Crop factor and field of view calculator
What a focal length becomes on your sensor, and which lens matches a full frame recommendation.
-
Depth of field calculator
Near and far limits of sharpness for any format, focal length, aperture and subject distance.
-
Hyperfocal distance calculator
The closest focus setting that still keeps infinity sharp, and how much depth it gains you.
Media and sync
Bitrate, card speed, storage and timecode, which are four views of the same media decision.
-
Recording bitrate and card speed calculator
What sustained write speed your camera mode demands, and which card class actually supports it.
-
Media storage per hour calculator
How many gigabytes an hour your codec uses, how long a card lasts and what a shoot day needs.
-
Timecode and frame rate calculator
Timecode to frames, drop frame drift and running time at any frame rate.
Why these run in your browser
Every calculator on this site computes in the page with no data sent anywhere. Your rig weight, your codec and your battery load are not information anybody else needs, and a calculator that requires an account is a calculator you will not use on location.
Each one also shows its formula. A number you cannot check is a number you have to trust, and the arithmetic behind all of these is simple enough to verify: watt hours divided by watts, bitrate divided by eight, focal length squared over aperture times circle of confusion.
Where a figure is a practical rule of thumb rather than a published value, the page says so. The 70 to 80 percent gimbal working load and the 0.85 power conversion factor are both approximations that hold up in use, and presenting them as specifications would be dishonest.
The three numbers to run before buying anything
Rig weight first, because it is the input to everything else. A caged full frame body with a fast standard zoom is typically 2.0 to 2.4 kg, and adding a monitor and a battery plate takes it past 3 kg. That single figure decides which gimbal class and which fluid head capacity your build requires.
Then gimbal payload, if movement is part of your work. A rated payload is a motor torque limit reached at perfect balance, not a comfortable operating point, and buying a stabiliser that cannot carry the rig you already own is the most expensive mistake in that category.
Then storage per hour, because codec choice is a media decision as much as an image one. A jump from long-GOP to ProRes multiplies your drive, offload and archive costs by roughly four, and that cost recurs on every project rather than once.
What a calculator cannot tell you
Whether the shot is worth taking. Every figure here is a constraint check, and constraints do not make creative decisions. A gimbal that fits your payload is not an argument for a moving shot, and a codec that fits your card is not an argument for shooting RAW.
It also cannot account for a badly balanced rig, a cold battery, a hot card or a cheap plate losing more in conversion than the model assumes. Treat every result as a planning figure with margin rather than as a limit to run against.
For decisions rather than numbers, the head to head comparisons give thresholds you can measure your own work against, and the two complete build ladders show what all of this looks like applied at three budgets.
Elsewhere on the site
- Both complete build ladders
The numbers applied at three budgets each.
- Reference charts
The same maths as lookup tables.
- All gear roundups
The products these figures apply to.
- All guides
What the numbers actually mean.
- Rig setups by camera
The figures for a specific body.
- Head to head comparisons
Decisions the numbers inform.